How Does State Lemon Law Differ from Federal Lemon Law?

State lemon law and Federal Lemon Law are principally the same: they exist to protect consumers against owning products that fail to live up to the manufacturer’s warranty, establishing rights and remedies that allow consumers to recover all or a significant portion of their investment. From a consumer perspective, the most significant difference between state lemon law and Federal Lemon Law regards reimbursement for lemon products. While state lemon law entitles consumers to receive either a free replacement product or a refund of the defective product’s purchase price, Federal Lemon Law only entitles consumer’s to receive a cash award.

 Another difference between state and Federal Lemon Law is that the latter is typically less restrictive of the circumstances under which a product can qualify as a lemon. For example, whereas state lemon law establishes that a consumer vehicle must undergo a certain number of repairs within a certain range of miles after its original delivery date to achieve lemon status, Federal Lemon Law states that, as long as a consumer vehicle is under the manufacturer’s original warranty, it can qualify as a lemon. Concerning vehicles, a third major difference between state and Federal Lemon law is that Federal Lemon law covers certain types of vehicles that lemon laws in many states do not, including: motorcycles, mobile homes, speed boats and used cars.

 Although manufacturers are usually motivated to settle lemon law cases out of court for financial reasons, reaching a favorable settlement usually requires the aid of a lemon law attorney. Because only attorneys can file lawsuits, simply displaying to a manufacturer that you are aware of lemon laws usually won’t motivate a settlement. Due to the prevalence of Federal Lemon Law cases, many attorneys that concentrate in state lemon law are also skilled in the Federal Lemon Law.

Be Sociable, Share!

Leave a Reply






What Happened:
* Required Fields
 
  • Audi Motorcars responds to ‘Lemon Law’ complaint October 23, 2014
    A recent case invoking the Philippine Lemon Law has been filed with the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) by retired Air Force colonel Ricardo L. Nolasco regarding an allegedly defective Audi A6 TDI. In his complaint, Nolasco sought the replacement of the brand-new Audi A6 3.0 TDI he bought on May 30 due to defects (error messages appearing erratically
  • DTI to decide case of ‘lemon’ Audi October 19, 2014
    The Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) will rule on the merits of a complaint by a car-buyer who claimed he was sold a “defective” brand-new vehicle and the seller should either replace it or give him a refund in accordance with the recently enacted Philippine Lemon Law.
  • DTI to resolve first case under Lemon Law October 19, 2014
    MANILA - The Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) will finally take over a case that will test the newly implemented Philippine Lemon Law.
  • Lemon Law campaign enjoys smashing time October 15, 2014
    Megan Mackander Journalist After completing a journalism degree at the University of the Sunshine Coast, I joined the Sunshine Coast Daily in 2010. As the Daily’s police reporter, the round is unprectible, diverse and challenging, but also exciting and is a dream position for me.
  • Have ‘Lemon law’ to protect car buyers, says consumer group October 13, 2014
    Would a new car buyer prefer to get a replacement for a defective vehicle or have it constantly repaired during the warranty period? Following a spike in complaints about vehicle purchases and after-sales service, a local consumer advocacy group wants the "Lemon law" introduced here to enable consumers to make claims within a short period of...