How Does State Lemon Law Differ from Federal Lemon Law?

State lemon law and Federal Lemon Law are principally the same: they exist to protect consumers against owning products that fail to live up to the manufacturer’s warranty, establishing rights and remedies that allow consumers to recover all or a significant portion of their investment. From a consumer perspective, the most significant difference between state lemon law and Federal Lemon Law regards reimbursement for lemon products. While state lemon law entitles consumers to receive either a free replacement product or a refund of the defective product’s purchase price, Federal Lemon Law only entitles consumer’s to receive a cash award.

 Another difference between state and Federal Lemon Law is that the latter is typically less restrictive of the circumstances under which a product can qualify as a lemon. For example, whereas state lemon law establishes that a consumer vehicle must undergo a certain number of repairs within a certain range of miles after its original delivery date to achieve lemon status, Federal Lemon Law states that, as long as a consumer vehicle is under the manufacturer’s original warranty, it can qualify as a lemon. Concerning vehicles, a third major difference between state and Federal Lemon law is that Federal Lemon law covers certain types of vehicles that lemon laws in many states do not, including: motorcycles, mobile homes, speed boats and used cars.

 Although manufacturers are usually motivated to settle lemon law cases out of court for financial reasons, reaching a favorable settlement usually requires the aid of a lemon law attorney. Because only attorneys can file lawsuits, simply displaying to a manufacturer that you are aware of lemon laws usually won’t motivate a settlement. Due to the prevalence of Federal Lemon Law cases, many attorneys that concentrate in state lemon law are also skilled in the Federal Lemon Law.

Be Sociable, Share!

Leave a Reply

What Happened:
* Required Fields
  • DTI decisions on consumer complaints are appealable to high court, not to the Palace – SC October 21, 2014
    The Supreme Court has upheld a Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) ruling holding a car dealer liable for the defects of a brand new vehicle a consumer bought for P3.3 million in 2003.
  • DTI to decide case of ‘lemon’ Audi October 19, 2014
    The Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) will rule on the merits of a complaint by a car-buyer who claimed he was sold a “defective” brand-new vehicle and the seller should either replace it or give him a refund in accordance with the recently enacted Philippine Lemon Law.
  • DTI to resolve first case under Lemon Law October 19, 2014
    MANILA - The Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) will finally take over a case that will test the newly implemented Philippine Lemon Law.
  • Lemon Law campaign enjoys smashing time October 15, 2014
    Megan Mackander Journalist After completing a journalism degree at the University of the Sunshine Coast, I joined the Sunshine Coast Daily in 2010. As the Daily’s police reporter, the round is unprectible, diverse and challenging, but also exciting and is a dream position for me.
  • Have ‘Lemon law’ to protect car buyers, says consumer group October 13, 2014
    Would a new car buyer prefer to get a replacement for a defective vehicle or have it constantly repaired during the warranty period? Following a spike in complaints about vehicle purchases and after-sales service, a local consumer advocacy group wants the "Lemon law" introduced here to enable consumers to make claims within a short period of...