How Does State Lemon Law Differ from Federal Lemon Law?

State lemon law and Federal Lemon Law are principally the same: they exist to protect consumers against owning products that fail to live up to the manufacturer’s warranty, establishing rights and remedies that allow consumers to recover all or a significant portion of their investment. From a consumer perspective, the most significant difference between state lemon law and Federal Lemon Law regards reimbursement for lemon products. While state lemon law entitles consumers to receive either a free replacement product or a refund of the defective product’s purchase price, Federal Lemon Law only entitles consumer’s to receive a cash award.

 Another difference between state and Federal Lemon Law is that the latter is typically less restrictive of the circumstances under which a product can qualify as a lemon. For example, whereas state lemon law establishes that a consumer vehicle must undergo a certain number of repairs within a certain range of miles after its original delivery date to achieve lemon status, Federal Lemon Law states that, as long as a consumer vehicle is under the manufacturer’s original warranty, it can qualify as a lemon. Concerning vehicles, a third major difference between state and Federal Lemon law is that Federal Lemon law covers certain types of vehicles that lemon laws in many states do not, including: motorcycles, mobile homes, speed boats and used cars.

 Although manufacturers are usually motivated to settle lemon law cases out of court for financial reasons, reaching a favorable settlement usually requires the aid of a lemon law attorney. Because only attorneys can file lawsuits, simply displaying to a manufacturer that you are aware of lemon laws usually won’t motivate a settlement. Due to the prevalence of Federal Lemon Law cases, many attorneys that concentrate in state lemon law are also skilled in the Federal Lemon Law.

Be Sociable, Share!

Leave a Reply

What Happened:
* Required Fields
  • Shelbyville, Indiana Jury Finds 2013 Ford Explorer to Be Unmerchantable August 26, 2014
    On Thursday July 31, 2014 and after a 3 day jury trial, a verdict was delivered in favor of Fountaintown, Indiana couple, Mary and Lowell Bell, and against Ford Motor Company in a federal and state "lemon ...
  • CAMPI pushes for 20% standard depreciation in Lemon Law IRR August 25, 2014
    Automotive players expect the standard 20 percent depreciation rate on the first year or upon purchase of a unit to be incorporated in the implementing rules and regulations of the Lemon Law or Republic Act No. 10642 Atty. Rommel Gutierrez, who is president of the Chamber of Automotive Manufacturers of the Philippines Inc. (CAMPI), told reporters the 20 perc
  • If Your New Car 'Tries To Kill You,' Can You Return It? August 25, 2014
    This tale from Lemon Law Lawyer Steve Lehto shows just what happens when, through no fault of your own, your new car tries to kill you. Literally. It shoots something at you. This is how you can send it back from where it came. Read more...
  • LGC part of Lemon Law IRR draft group August 21, 2014
    CITY OF SAN FERNANDO -- The Laus Group of Companies (LGC) announced recently that it is set to participate in the crafting of the implementing rules and regulations (IRR) of the recently passed Republic Act 10642, or the Philippine Lemon Law.
  • Corvette Custody Battle August 17, 2014
    Everyone liked the last Corvette story so much, I thought I'd tell you about another Corvette that found itself in a legal squabble I got to handle. As I have mentioned before, I specialize in Lemon Law but people often call my office when they have any case involving a car. Read more...